Cases
Matlock v. Clayton We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2023cv00011
Petitioner: Michael Aron Matlock
Respondent: Deon Clayton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Montes et al v. Matlock et al
as 3:2021cv00229
Plaintiff: Marina Montes and Lidia Elizabeth Garcia
Defendant: Michael Jay Matlock and Quality Carriers Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Matlock v. Bryant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2017cv00645
Petitioner: Michael A Matlock
Respondent: Jason Bryant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Matlock v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2015cv01132
Plaintiff: Michael J Matlock
Defendant: Illinois Department of Corrections, Bruce Rauner, Donald Stolworthy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Matlock v. California Board of Parole Hea, et al
as 13-17512
Petitioner - Appellant: MICHAEL STEPHEN MATLOCK
Respondent - Appellee: CALIFORNIA BOARD OF PAROLE HEARINGS, JAMES FOX, San Mateo County District Attorney, MYRA A. WEIHER, Appellate Attorney of Record and others
Matlock v. Acevedo
as 3:2011cv03148
Petitioner: Michael J Matlock
Respondent: Gerado Acevedo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Michael Matlock v. Mike Martel, et al
as 11-16023
Petitioner - Appellant: MICHAEL STEPHEN MATLOCK
Respondent - Appellee: MIKE MARTEL, CALIFORNIA BOARD OF PAROLE HEARINGS, JAMES FOX, San Mateo County District Attorney and others
Matlock v. Martel, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv03049
Petitioner: Michael Stephen Matlock
Respondent: California Board of Parole Hearings, James Fox and Myra A. Weiher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Matlock v. Brown et al
as 2:2008cv01665
Petitioner: Michael Stephen Matlock
Defendant: Edmund G. Brown, Jr., James Tilton, James Davis and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?