Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Baxter v. Saratoga County Correctional Facility et al
as 9:2022cv01225
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Baxter
Defendant:
Saratoga County Correctional Facility, Colonel Richard J. Emory, C/O John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baxter v. Saratoga County Correctional Facility et al
as 1:2022cv09349
Plaintiff:
Mr. Michael Anthony Baxter
Defendant:
Saratoga County Correctional Facility, Colonel Richard J. Emory, C/O John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BAXTER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv42445
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL S BAXTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GLOVER v. BAXTER et al
as 5:2019cv00181
Defendant:
COREY E SILCOX, MICHAEL A MONEYHAM, MICHAEL J BAXTER and others
Plaintiff:
DARREN L GLOVER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Michael Baxter
as 18-11600
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL J. BAXTER
USA v. Owen Hinkson
as 17-14142
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
OWEN HINKSON, a.k.a.: Michael G. Baxter, Micheal G. Baxter, Owen Baxter, Paul Baxter, Paul Christopher Baxter, Charles Downs, Owen Hickson, Johns Hinkson, Owen G. Hinkson, Owens Hinkson, Michael Lane, Michael Mc Lane, Michael McLane, Michael Payne, Owen H
Baxter v. New York State Department of Corrections & Community Services et al
as 1:2016cv03153
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Baxter
Defendant:
New York State Department of Corrections & Community Services, Willard Drug Treatment Center and Adirondack Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baxter v. NYC Prisoner Health Services et al
as 1:2013cv02858
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Baxter
Defendant:
NYC Prisoner Health Services and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
