General Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 73
Davis v. Chandler, Warden We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2013cv00439
Petitioner: Michael Anthony Davis
Respondent: Rodney W Chandler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Davis v. The People of the State of Indiana
as 2:2013cv00066
Petitioner: Michael James Davis
Respondent: State of Indiana The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DAVIS v. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF INDIANA
as 1:2013cv00232
Petitioner: MICHAEL JAMES DAVIS
Respondent: THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. Chandler We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2013cv00088
Petitioner: Michael Anthony Davis
Respondent: Randall Chandler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Davis v. Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2013cv00186
Petitioner: Michael Anthony Davis
Respondent: Rick Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2012cv03939
Respondent: Rick Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
Petitioner: Michael Anthnoy Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Michael Davis v. Carmen Palmer
as 12-2020
Petitioner - Appellant: MICHAEL ANTONIO DAVIS
Respondent - Appellee: CARMEN PALMER, Warden
Michael Davis v. Ken Clark
as 12-15558
Petitioner - Appellant: MICHAEL AARON DAVIS
Respondent - Appellee: KEN CLARK
Michael Davis v. Angel Medina
as 12-1198
Petitioner - Appellant: MICHAEL J. DAVIS
Respondent - Appellee: ANGEL MEDINA, Warden
Davis v. Grounds We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2012cv00033
Petitioner: Michael Wayne Davis
Respondent: Randy Grounds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?