Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00818
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
DAVIES et al v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2020cv03325
Defendant:
McKESSON CORP., MERCK & CO., INC. and MERCK SHARP AND DOHME CORP.;
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL FRANCIS DAVIES and TONYA DAVIES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DAVIS v. WELLS FARGO U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION et al
as 2:2016cv06042
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL EARL DAVIS
Defendant:
WELLS FARGO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ABELL v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 5:2015cv01049
Plaintiff:
ABELL, THOMAS ABELL, KATHARINE ADAMS-LOVE and others
Defendant:
ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, THE ALLSTATE CORPORATION, AGENTS PENSION PLAN and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION v. DAVIS
as 5:2015cv00494
Plaintiff:
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Defendant:
MICHAEL E. DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
DAVIS v. WELLS FARGO et al
as 2:2014cv07014
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL EARL DAVIS
Defendant:
WELLS FARGO and ASSURANT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
DAVIS et al v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
as 2:2014cv06979
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL E. DAVIS and GLOBAL SALES CALL CENTER, LLC
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kearney v. Davis et al
as 1:2013cv01852
Plaintiff:
Richard Muliek Kearney
Defendant:
Michael J. Davis, Charles E. Gleichman and Kane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DAVIS v. U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
as 2:2012cv05943
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL E. DAVIS
Defendant:
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
McClain v. Davis et al
as 1:2012cv00352
Plaintiff:
Ralph W. McClain, Jr.
Defendant:
Michael Leander Davis, All Third Shift Punch Rounds Officers, Buck and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
