Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Barton v. Clark et al
as 1:2023cv05827
Plaintiff:
Michael Alexander Barton
Defendant:
Darcel Clark, New York State Police, The Bronx County Clerk and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 vc Fed. Question: Violation of Constitutional Rights
Benjamin et al v. City of New York
as 1:2023cv05458
Plaintiff:
Albert-Ann Benjamin, Ronnie Ford, Yoshica Smalls and others
Defendant:
City of New York
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Nadine Dyer-Wilkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv02373
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Bradley v. Berryhill
as 1:2017cv00333
Plaintiff:
Michael Alexander Bradley
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Alexander v. Miller
as 16-4055
Petitioner - Appellant:
Michael Alexander
Respondent - Appellee:
Christopher Miller
Alexander v. Miller
as 1:2016cv03415
Petitioner:
Michael Alexander
Respondent:
Christopher Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alexander v. Bureau of Prisons
as 9:2016cv00086
Petitioner:
Michael Alexander
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bradley v. Colvin
as 1:2014cv00088
Plaintiff:
Michael Alexander Bradley
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Alexander et al v. Chesapeake Appalachia LLC et al
as 3:2011cv00308
Plaintiff:
Arlene Alexander , Michael Alexander , Gary Allen and others
Defendant:
Chesapeake Appalachia LLC and Statoilhydro USA Onshore Properties, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Mehlman v. Merck & Co., Inc.
as 1:2009cv02692
Plaintiff:
Michael Alexander Mehlman and Michael Alexander Mehlman
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
