Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Michael Rufus v. Warden Lou
as 24-6127
Petitioner: MICHAEL ALONZA RUFUS
Defendant: WARDEN LOU
Michael Rufus v. Warden, Petersburg Low FCI
as 23-7269
Petitioner / Appellant: MICHAEL ALONZA RUFUS
Respondent / Appellee: WARDEN, PETERSBURG FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Rufus v. Weigle et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv04421
Plaintiff: Michael Alonza Rufus
Defendant: Charles H. Weigle, Shiva V. Hodges, Paige J. Gossett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, Federal Filers (Bivens)
Michael Rufus v. Warden
as 23-6644
Petitioner / Appellant: MICHAEL ALONZA RUFUS
Respondent / Appellee: WARDEN
Rufus v. Warden
as 1:2023cv00758
Petitioner: Michael Alonza Rufus
Respondent: Warden and Warden at Petersburg Low Federal Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 f
Rufus v. Doe We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2023cv01690
Petitioner: Michael Alonza Rufus
Respondent: John Doe and Warden Petersburg Low Federal Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Rufus v. Warden We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2023cv00798
Petitioner: Micahel Alonza Rufus and Michael Alonza Rufus
Respondent: Warden and Warden at Petersburg Low Federal Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
In re: Michael Rufus
as 23-1195
Petitioner: In re: MICHAEL ALONZA RUFUS, Individual and non-other person - see Dictionary Act
Rufus v. Lou
as 1:2022cv01043
Petitioner: Michael Alonza Rufus
Defendant: Warden Lou
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
US v. Michael Rufus
as 22-4161
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: MICHAEL ALONZA RUFUS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?