Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Lynch v. Lumpkin
as 6:2023cv00189
Petitioner:
Derrick Lynch
Respondent:
Michael Alsobrook and Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Eller v. Cole
as 23-50018
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Clint Harrison Eller
Defendant / Appellee:
CO Gary W. Cole, Pamela G. Taylor, Lt. FNU Simmons and others
Nall v. Lofton et al
as 6:2023cv00013
Plaintiff:
Dustin W. Nall
Defendant:
Cynthia Lofton, Assist. Warden FNU Akwitti, Michael Alsobrook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eller v. Cole et al
as 6:2022cv00857
Plaintiff:
Clint Harrison Eller
Defendant:
CO Gary W Cole, Pamela G. Taylor, Lt FNU Simmons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Friend v. Armstrong et al
as 6:2022cv00850
Plaintiff:
James A Friend
Defendant:
Sr Warden Bruce Armstrong, Michael Alsobrook, H. M. Pederson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Lighten et al
as 6:2022cv00835
Plaintiff:
Andrie Smith
Defendant:
Major Lawrence Lighten, Michelle Washburn, Ashley Curry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lumsden v. Collier et al
as 6:2022cv00822
Plaintiff:
Raymond E. Lumsden
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Bobby Lumpkin, Oscar Mendoza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nall v. Lofton et al
as 6:2022cv00608
Plaintiff:
Dustin W. Nall
Defendant:
Cynthia Lofton, Assist. Warden FNU Akwitti, Michael Alsobrook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parker v. Armstrong et al
as 6:2022cv00413
Plaintiff:
Leon Tony Parker
Defendant:
Bruce Armstrong, Michael Alsobrook and Captain Daniel Parker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nelson v. McKenzie et al
as 6:2021cv01369
Plaintiff:
Quincy Nelson
Defendant:
Timothy McKenzie, Vicki Cundiff, Michael Alsobrook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
