Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Michael Johnson v. Dexter Payne, et al
as 23-1805
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael Andrew Johnson
Defendant / Appellee:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, William Straughn, Chief Deputy Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, Benny Magness, Board of Correction, Arkansas Department of Correction and others
Michael Johnson v. Dexter Payne, et al
as 23-1433
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael Andrew Johnson
Defendant / Appellee:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, William Straughn, Chief Deputy Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, Benny Magness, Board of Correction, Arkansas Department of Correction and others
Michael Johnson v. Dexter Payne, et al
as 22-1695
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael Andrew Johnson
Defendant / Appellee:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, William Straughn, Chief Deputy Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, Benny Magness, Board of Correction, Arkansas Department of Correction and others
Johnson v. Payne et al
as 4:2021cv00488
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Benny Magness, William Straughn and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Andrew Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Johnson v. Wendy Kelley, et al
as 21-1551
Defendant / Appellee:
Jada Lawrence, Assistant to Director Kelley, Arkansas Department of Correction (originally names as Jada Lawerence), Mindy Shell, Assistant to Director Kelley, Arkansas Department of Correction, Byron Brown, Lieutenant, Wrightsville Unit, Department of Correction (originally named as Brown) and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael Andrew Johnson
Johnson v. Kelley et al
as 4:2020cv00806
Defendant:
Byron Brown and Wendy Kelley
Plaintiff:
Michael Andrew Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Kelley et al
as 5:2019cv00242
Plaintiff:
Michael Andrew Johnson
Defendant:
Wendy Kelley, Jada Lawerence, Paroon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
