Cases 21 - 30 of 38
IBRAHIM v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE et al
as 1:2010cv01099
Plaintiff:
NIZAR IBRAHIM
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE, MICHAEL B. DONLEY and MICHAEL KING
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
In re: George Jurich
as 10-1840
Movant:
In re: GEORGE JURICH
Respondent:
MICHAEL B. DONLEY, Secretary of the Air Force
MANEELY v. DONLEY
as 1:2010cv00991
Plaintiff:
MARK A. MANEELY
Defendant:
MICHAEL B. DONLEY
Cause Of Action: 10 U.S.C. § 1552
STRUBE, INC. v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 5:2010cv01588
Plaintiff:
STRUBE, INC.
Defendant:
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, ROBERT M. GATES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Carter v. Donley
as 1:2009cv00997
Plaintiff:
Charles B. Carter
Defendant:
Michael B. Donley
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Alf v. Donley et al
as 1:2009cv01190
Plaintiff:
Lori L. Alf
Defendant:
Michael B. Donley, Robert M. Gates, Steven A. Shaw and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
Paula K. Fisk v. Department of the Air Force et al
as 2:2008cv08511
Defendant:
Department of the Air Force and Michael B. Donley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Cottrell v. Donley
as 09-6127
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CONNIE L. COTTRELL
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL B. DONLEY, Secretary of United States Department of the Air Force
ALF v. DONLEY et al
as 1:2009cv00802
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER J. ALF
Defendant:
MICHAEL B. DONLEY, ROBERT M. GATES, STEVEN A. SHAW and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
CITY OF VALPARAISO v. UNITED STATES AIR FORCE et al
as 3:2009cv00135
Plaintiff:
CITY OF VALPARAISO
Defendant:
UNITED STATES AIR FORCE, DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, MICHAEL B. DONLEY and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
