Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Bryant v. Birmingham, Alabama, City of et al
as 2:2022cv00982
Plaintiff:
Michael Bryant
Defendant:
Birmingham, Alabama, City of, Dontrell McCray, Birmingham Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Bryant et al
as 3:2021cv00646
Defendant:
Ms. Kemp, James Michael Janousek, II, Sean Masear and others
Plaintiff:
Tony Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROLAND v. STATE OF FLORIDA et al
as 1:2020cv00002
Defendant:
JERRY B MILLER, DAVID A GLANT, MICHAEL BRYANT and others
Plaintiff:
GREGORY ROLAND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bryant v. Woods (INMATE 1)
as 2:2019cv00274
Plaintiff:
Michael Bryant
Defendant:
Walter Woods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bryant v. Woods (INMATE 1)
as 2:2018cv00300
Plaintiff:
Michael Bryant
Defendant:
Walter Woods
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROLAND v. MILLER et al
as 1:2013cv00124
Plaintiff:
GREGORY ROBERT ROLAND
Defendant:
JERRY MILLER, MICHAEL BRYANT, GLENN BRYAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bryant v. State of Florida
as 1:2013cv21982
Plaintiff:
Michael Bryant
Defendant:
State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bryant v. Downs et al
as 6:2009cv01670
Petitioner:
Audrey Michael Bryant
Respondent:
Robert Downs, Transport Driver #1 John Doe and Transport Driver #2 John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bryant v. Downs et al
as 1:2009cv22454
Plaintiff:
Audrey Michael Bryant
Defendant:
Robert Downs, Transport Driver #1 John Doe and Transport Driver #2 John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Bryant v. U. S. Prisoner Transport et al
as 6:2009cv00402
Plaintiff:
Audrey Michael Bryant
Defendant:
U. S. Prisoner Transport and Robert Downs
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
