Cases 1 - 10 of 10
CHAVIS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv07448
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL CHAVIS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CHAVIS v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2022cv00618
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL CHAVIS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, DRUG ENFORCEMENT AGENCY and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Chavis v. Work Boat Electrical Services, L.L.C.
as 2:2020cv02760
Plaintiff:
Michael Chavis
Defendant:
Work Boat Electrical Services, L.L.C. and Work Boat Electrical Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
CHAVIS v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2019cv00170
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL CHAVIS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Chavis et al v. Plumbers and Steamfitters Local 486 Pension Plan et al
as 1:2017cv02729
Plaintiff:
Michael Chavis and Stanley Taylorson, Jr.
Defendant:
Plumbers and Steamfitters Local 486 Pension Plan, William Welsh, Mark Jackman and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
In the Matter of Michael Chavis, Juror
as 1:2017mc00042
In_re:
Michael Chavis
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Chavis v. Unger
as 9:2010cv01086
Petitioner:
Michael Chavis
Respondent:
David M. Unger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Chavis v. Unger
as 1:2010cv00685
Petitioner:
Michael Chavis
Respondent:
David M. Unger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Kroedel et al v. Johnson Controls, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv02546
Plaintiff:
Steven Kroedel, Steven Kroedel, Melissa Kroedel and others
Defendant:
Johnson Controls, Inc. and Michael Chavis
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Chavis v. Giambruno
as 9:2007cv00657
Petitioner:
Michael Chavis
Respondent:
Michael Giambruno
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
