Cases 21 - 30 of 59
Adil Hiramanek, et al v. L. Clark, et al
as 14-17056
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ADIL HIRAMANEK and RODA HIRAMANEK
Defendant - Appellee:
L. MICHAEL CLARK, SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, SANTA CLARA COUNTY, DARYLL MCCHRISTIAN and others
Clark v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2014at01099
Plaintiff:
Michael Clark
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation , Nevada Department of Corrections, R Hickman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2014cv02066
Plaintiff:
Michael Clark
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation , Nevada Department of Corrections, Roderick Hickman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Biedma v. Clark et al
as 3:2014cv02853
Plaintiff:
Kyle David Biedma
Defendant:
Michael Clark and City of Santa Rosa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Clark v. Beard et al
as 2:2014cv01303
Plaintiff:
Michael Clark
Defendant:
J. Beard , F. Foulk , S. Peery and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Clark v. Beard et al
as 2:2014at00686
Plaintiff:
Michael Clark
Defendant:
J. Beard , F. Foulk , S. Peery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phillips v. City of Santa Rosa, et al
as 3:2013cv05844
Defendant:
City of Santa Rosa and Michael Clark
Plaintiff:
James Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Adil Hiramanek, et al v. L. Clark, et al
as 13-16857
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ADIL HIRAMANEK and RODA HIRAMANEK
Defendant - Appellee:
L. MICHAEL CLARK, EDWARD MILLS, DAVID YAMSAKI and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv01355
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Blufocus Inc v. Michael Clark et al
as 2:2013cv04688
Plaintiff:
Blufocus Inc
Defendant:
Michael Clark, Cross Check Media, Does and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
