Cases 1 - 10 of 76
Matson v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00140
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Matson
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Cheatham County Sheriff's Department et al
as 3:2023cv01309
Plaintiff:
Ryan Mart Anderson
Defendant:
Cheatham County Sheriff's Department, Sheriff Tim Binkley, Cheatham County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Richardson v. Davidson County Sheriff Office (DCSO)
as 3:2023cv00308
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Richardson
Defendant:
Davidson County Sheriff Office (DCSO)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bennett v. T-Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2022cv00632
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Bennett
Defendant:
T-Department of Corrections, f/n/u Hedge, Tracy Tomlin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richardson v. Robertson et al
as 3:2022cv00716
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Richardson
Defendant:
Lt. T. Robertson and DCSO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Akers v. Maerkle et al
as 3:2020cv01107
Defendant:
Steven W. Pite, Matthew K. Menger, John W. Aldridge, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Deborah L. Akers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones v. Mays et al
as 3:2021cv00666
Plaintiff:
Henry L. Jones
Defendant:
Tony Mays, Ernest Lewis, George Firestine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sales v. Medical Staff
as 2:2021cv02340
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Sales
Defendant:
Medical Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sales v. Medical Staff
as 1:2021cv02340
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Sales
Defendant:
Medical Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boileau et al v. Berkshire Hathaway, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv00139
Defendant:
Sarah O'Connell, Berkshire Hathaway, Inc., Thomas Murphy and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Tangredi Boileau and Kyle Joseph Boileau
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
