Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
David Harper v. Michael Nedd, et al
as 22-35036
Plaintiff / Appellee: DAVID HARPER
Defendant / Appellant: MICHAEL D. NEDD, Deputy Director and KEVIN T. GRAHAM, Chief
Defendant: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR and DEBRA ANNE HAALAND
Harper et al v. Department of Interior et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv00197
Defendant: Department of Interior, Interior Secretary Debra Anne Haaland, Deputy Director Michael D. Nedd and others
Plaintiff: David Harper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ginger Kathrens, et al v. Scott de la Vega, et al
as 21-35094
Plaintiff / Appellee: CLOUD FOUNDATION, AMERICAN WILD HORSE CAMPAIGN, GINGER KATHRENS and others
Defendant / Appellant: JEFFREY ROSE, in his official capacity as District Manager of the BLM Burns District Office;, BARRY BUSHUE, in his official capacity as the State Director for BLM Oregon, SCOTT DE LA VEGA, Secretary, Department of the Interior and others
Shoshone Bannock Tribes of the Fort Hall Reservation v. United States of America et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2018cv00285
Plaintiff: Shoshone Bannock Tribes of the Fort Hall Reservation
Defendant: United States of America, John Tahsuda III, Twyla Stange and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Esquivel v. Zinke et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv00148
Plaintiff: Alfredo Cruz Esquivel and Donald David Willard
Defendant: Ryan Zinke, Bureau of Land Management, Brian Steed and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
American Wild Horse Campaign et al v. Zinke et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv00059
Plaintiff: American Wild Horse Campaign and Kimerlee Curyl
Defendant: Michael D. Nedd, Jill C. Silvey and Ryan Zinke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?