Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Louis Holger Eklund, et al v. Timothy Burgess, et al
as 20-35112
Defendant / Appellee:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, RICH CURTNER, MARLIN L. RITZMAN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LOUIS HOLGER EKLUND
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ANTHONY OGLE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv08027
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Holger et al v. Burgess et al
as 3:2018cv00277
Defendant:
State of Alaska Inc., Shawn Rice, Families Matter LLP and others
Plaintiff:
Louis Holger and Michael Anthony Ogle
Smith v. Trabanino et al
as 3:2017cv05136
Plaintiff:
Michael D Smith
Defendant:
Bryan Trabanino, Bay Area Rapid Transit District, Wilson Velasquez-Ochoa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Calftech corporation v. Zia Agricultural Consulting et al
as 1:2013cv01036
Plaintiff:
Calftech corporation
Defendant:
Zia Agricultural Consulting, Al Perez, Sean Perez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Calftech corporation v. Zia Agricultural Consulting et al
as 1:2013at00444
Plaintiff:
Calftech corporation
Defendant:
Zia Agricultural Consulting, Al Perez, Sean Perez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Smith v. LeGrande et al
as 2:2012cv01260
Respondent:
Attorney General for the State of Nevada and Robert LeGrande
Petitioner:
Michael D. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Burns et al
as 3:2012cv00132
Respondent:
Warden Burns and Nevada Attorney General
Petitioner:
Michael D. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Michael D Smith v. Michael J Astrue
as 2:2011cv07090
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Plaintiff:
Michael D Smith
Smith vs Neven, et al
as 3:2011cv00531
Defendant:
Aranas, High Desert State Prison and Neven
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
