Cases 21 - 30 of 33
Michael Williams v. Marvin Powers, et al
as 12-1986
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL E. WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
MARVIN F. POWERS, Doctor, YOLANDE JOHNSON, Chief Administrative Officer/Warden of Tamms Correctional Center, JACKIE MILLER, Administrative Review Board Member and others
Michael Williams v. Donald Gaetz
as 10-2972
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL E. WILLIAMS
Respondent - Appellee:
DONALD GAETZ
Williams, Michael v. Grams, Gregory et al
as 3:2010cv00433
Plaintiff:
Michael E. Williams
Defendant:
Gregory Grams , Janel Nickel , Dylon Radtke and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS et al v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv68819
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL E WILLIAMS and BRENDA WILLIAMS
Defendant:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION , PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION , UNITED STATES MINERAL PRODUCTS COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Michael Williams v. Domingo Uribe, Jr.
as 09-73882
Petitioner:
MICHAEL E. WILLIAMS
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA and DOMINGO URIBE, Jr.
Williams v. Astrue
as 1:2009cv05187
Plaintiff:
Michael E. Williams and Michael E. Williams
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Williams v. Humphrey et al
as 2:2009cv00763
Plaintiff:
Michael E. Williams
Defendant:
Robert Humphrey, Jason Aldana, Cus Howard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael E. Williams v. Domingo Uribe Jr.
as 2:2009cv03185
Petitioner:
Michael E. Williams
Respondent:
Domingo Uribe, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Humphrey et al
as 3:2009cv00202
Plaintiff:
Michael E. Williams
Defendant:
Robert Humphrey, Jason Aldana, Cus Howard and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Michael Williams v. Ken Bartley
as 08-1462
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL E. WILLIAMS
Respondent - Appellee:
KENNETH BARTLEY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
