Cases 1 - 8 of 8
C. et al v. City of Arcata et al
as 4:2022cv04804
Plaintiff:
A. C., C. C., D. C. and others
Defendant:
CITY OF ARCATA, City of Arcata Police Department, BRIAN AHEARN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Estate of Charles Chivrell et al v. City of Arcata et al
as 4:2022cv00019
Plaintiff:
Estate of Charles Chivrell, Arielle Chivrell, K. C. and others
Defendant:
City of Arcata, Arcata Police Department, Brian Ahearn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dawn Devore et al v. United States Department of Defense et al
as 8:2020cv00563
Defendant:
United States Department of Homeland Security, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, INSITU and others
Plaintiff:
George Anthony Ban, III, Steffini Sellers and Dawn Devore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
(PS) Devore v. CDCR, et al.,
as 2:2018cv02487
Defendant:
BINJ Laboratories, Eugene Tu, Michael Griffin and others
Plaintiff:
Dawn Devore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Griffin v. The Home Depot, Inc.
as 3:2011cv00889
Plaintiff:
Michael Griffin
Defendant:
The Home Depot, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Riches v. Rudolph et al
as 2:2007cv02182
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
Eric Robert Rudolph, James Charles Kopp, Dennis John Malvasi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robert M Nelson et al v. National Aeronautical and Space Agency et al
as 2:2007cv05669
Plaintiff:
Robert M Nelson, Robert M Nelson, Robert M Nelson and others
Defendant:
National Aeronautical and Space Agency, Michael Griffin, Department of Commerce and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Cintas Corporation v. Albright et al
as 3:2006cv05098
Petitioner:
Cintas Corporation
Respondent:
Ryan Albright , Robert D. Anderson , David W. Bippus and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
