Cases 51 - 60 of 66
Sparks v. Hale
as 5:2013cv00356
Plaintiff:
Theodore Sparks
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Defendant:
Michael Hale
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Hale
as 5:2013cv00341
Plaintiff:
Dempsey Smith
Defendant:
Michael Hale
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hale v. Vigil et al
as 1:2012cv00869
Plaintiff:
Christopher Michael Hale
Defendant:
J Vigil , FNU Eastridge , FNU Archuleta and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ironworkers Local Union No. 808 et al v. Champion Steel of Central Florida, Inc.
as 6:2012cv01187
Plaintiff:
Ironworkers Local Union No. 808 , Ironworkers Local Union No. 808 Pension Fund , Ironworkers Local Union No. 808 Annuity Fund and others
Defendant:
Champion Steel of Central Florida, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Joyce Brown v. Michael Hale, et al
as 12-5617
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOYCE BROWN, Dr.
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL HALE, JOHN DOE, #1 and JOHN DOE, #2
Vann v. Hale et al
as 2:2012cv00495
Plaintiff:
Jay F Vann
Defendant:
Michael Hale, Swanson Service Corporation, Katrina Ross and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vann v. Hale et al
as 2:2012cv00494
Petitioner:
Jay F Vann
Respondent:
Michael Hale, Randy Christian and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Vann v. Ross et al
as 2:2012cv00497
Plaintiff:
Jay F Vann
Defendant:
Katrina Ross, Anne Marie Adams, Cindy Collins and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vann v. Hale et al
as 2:2012cv00496
Plaintiff:
Jay F Vann
Defendant:
Michael Hale, Randy Christian, Reeves and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vann v. Hale et al
as 2:2011cv02800
Petitioner:
Jay F Vann
Respondent:
Attorney General of State of Alabama, The and Michael Hale
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
