Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 1 - 10 of 90
CARNEVALE v. CLARK et al
as 2:2019cv00842
Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, MICHAEL HARLOW, ALLEGHENY COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY and others
Petitioner: DANIEL THOMAS CARNEVALE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Burton v. Wetzel et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv01953
Plaintiff: Niara Burton
Defendant: John Wetzel , Brenda Tritt , Trevor Winguard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KNOX V. WETZEL et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv00078
Plaintiff: RANDY KNOX
Defendant: JOHN E. WETZEL, MICHAEL HARLOW, MARK BAKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Knox v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2015cv00466
Plaintiff: Randy Knox
Defendant: John E. Wetzel, Michael Harlow, Mark Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BURKE v. SCI ALBION et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv00145
Plaintiff: MICHAEL BURKE
Defendant: SCI ALBION , MICHAEL HARLOW , D'HAPPART and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FOUST v. WETZEL et al
as 1:2014cv00004
Petitioner: MICHAEL PAUL FOUST
Respondent: JOHN E. WETZEL and MICHAEL HARLOW
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BRINKLEY v. HARLOW et al
as 2:2014cv00055
Petitioner: KEVIN BRINKLEY
Respondent: MICHAEL HARLOW, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HARRISON v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2013cv01777
Petitioner: MICHAEL HARRISON
Respondent: JOHN E. WETZEL and MICHAEL HARLOW
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SAUNDERS v. HARLOW
as 2:2013cv07018
Petitioner: RONALD SAUNDERS
Respondent: MICHAEL HARLOW
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GARY v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2013cv01708
Petitioner: RAFAEL A. GARY
Respondent: JOHN E. WETZEL and MICHAEL HARLOW
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?