Cases 41 - 50 of 52
CARDER v. DODDS et al
as 1:2014cv00066
Plaintiff:
MARCUS CARDER
Defendant:
DODDS, MICHAEL HOLMAN, KEVIN SUTTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARDER v. HOLMAN et al
as 1:2014cv00062
Plaintiff:
MARCUS CARDER
Defendant:
MICHAEL HOLMAN, TERRY ROBERTS and SHELLY ENNIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARDER v. KENDZIORA et al
as 1:2014cv00068
Plaintiff:
MARCUS CARDER
Defendant:
JOHN KENDZIORA, MICHAEL HOLMAN, KEVIN SUTTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. SECURUS CORRECTIONAL BILLING et al
as 1:2014cv00042
Plaintiff:
ROSHA C. WILLIAMS
Defendant:
SECURUS CORRECTIONAL BILLING, ERIE COUNTY PRISON and MICHAEL HOLMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARDER v. SEYMOUR et al
as 1:2013cv00349
Plaintiff:
MARCUS CARDER
Defendant:
GARY SEYMOUR, KEVIN SUTTER, MICHAEL HOLMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BEASON v. SEYMOUR et al
as 1:2013cv00318
Plaintiff:
SHIDEE DUPREE BEASON
Defendant:
GARY SEYMOUR and MICHAEL HOLMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Passmore v. Joseph Iannello, et al
as 13-1599
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN PASSMORE
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH IANNELLO, CORPORAL AT ERIE COUNTY PRISON, JAMES VESHECCO, DIRECTOR OF CORRECTIONS/WARDEN AT ERIE COUNTY PRISON and MICHAEL HOLMAN, DEPUTY WARDEN AT ERIE COUNTY PRISON, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN THEIR OFFICIAL CAPACITIES
FOSTER v. HOLMAN et al
as 1:2013cv00066
Plaintiff:
KENDELL CHARLES FOSTER
Defendant:
MICHAEL HOLMAN and MEDICAL DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
KNIGHT v. HOLMAN et al
as 1:2012cv00212
Plaintiff:
JAMES KNIGHT
Defendant:
MICHAEL HOLMAN and PATTERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PASSMORE v. IANNELLO et al
as 1:2012cv00090
Plaintiff:
JOHN PASSMORE
Defendant:
JOSEPH IANNELLO, JAMES S. VESHECCO and MICHAEL HOLMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
