Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Marcum v. Stevens et al
as 2:2021cv02086
Defendant:
Attorney Sam Eastman, Len Bradley, Sara Capp and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald A Marcum
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marcum v. Stevens et al
as 4:2021cv00338
Defendant:
Ostendorf, Len Bradley, Sara Capp and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald A Marcum
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harrell v. Page et al
as 4:2021cv00050
Defendant:
Harrell Berryhill, William Straughn, Justine Minor and others
Plaintiff:
Buster Nelson Harrell, V
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ransom v. Parker et al
as 5:2019cv00149
Defendant:
Williams, Johnson, Parker and others
Plaintiff:
Stanley V Ransom, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Suggs et al v. Express Courier International, Inc. et al
as 5:2017cv05100
Plaintiff:
Janice Suggs , Chris Averette , Joshua Burrus and others
Defendant:
Express Courier International, Inc. and EMP LSO Holding Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Johnson v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2015cv00220
Plaintiff:
Michael Johnson
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Johnson v. GE Capital Retail Bank et al
as 5:2014cv05158
Plaintiff:
Michael Johnson
Defendant:
GE Capital Retail Bank and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0277
Johnson v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2013cv00171
Plaintiff:
Michael Johnson
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Johnson v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2011cv00037
Plaintiff:
Michael Johnson
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Vaughn v. Greene County, et al
as 2:2003cv00070
Plaintiff:
Susan Vaughn
Defendant:
Greene County, Arkansas and Does
Consol_defendant:
Christopher L Gray , David Wanner and Michael Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
