Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Ron Bounds v. Donna Byrnes, et al
as 22-35086
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RON BOUNDS
Defendant / Appellee:
DONNA BYRNES, Disciplinary Hearing Officer, KAY HEINRICH, Associate Superintendent, MICHAEL KERR, Counselor - T- Unit and others
Homburg v. Kerr et al
as 1:2017cv00201
Plaintiff:
Jason Homburg
Defendant:
Michael Kerr and Graye Wolfe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2014cv01991
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Dale Mitchell v. Spencer Fox, et al
as 14-35099
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DALE R. MITCHELL
Defendant - Appellee:
SPENCER FOX, MICHAEL KERR, JASON GAEDE and others
Mitchell v. Fox et al
as 2:2012cv05150
Plaintiff:
Dale Mitchell
Defendant:
Spencer Fox, Michael Kerr, Jason Gaede and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shain Michael Kerr v. Michael J Astrue
as 5:2012cv00782
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Plaintiff:
Shain Michael Kerr
Planet Bingo LLC v. Michael Kerr et al
as 5:2008cv01139
Defendant:
Does and Michael Kerr
Plaintiff:
Planet Bingo LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Negotiable Instrument
The Employee Painters' Trust, et al v. Ethan Enterprises, Inc., et al
as 08-36000
Plaintiff - Appellee:
THE EMPLOYEE PAINTERS' TRUST, RESILIENT FLOOR COVERING PENSION FUND, WESTERN WASHINGTON FLOOR COVERING APPRENTICESHIP FUND and others
Defendant:
ETHAN ENTERPRISES, INC., a Washington corporation, REBECCA S. JOHNSON, individually and MICHAEL KERR CO INC, a Washington corporation
Defendant - Appellant:
GREGORY S. TIFT, individually
The Employee Painters' Trust et al v. Ethan Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 2:2007mc00137
Plaintiff:
The Employee Painters' Trust, Resilient Floor Covering Pension Fund, Western Washington Floor Covering Apprenticeship Fund and others
Defendant:
Ethan Enterprises, Inc., Rebecca S. Johnson and Gregory S. Tift
Garnishee:
Michael Kerr Company, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
