Cases 1 - 10 of 67
Lloyd v. O'Malley
as 1:2023cv17092
Plaintiff:
Michael Lloyd
Defendant:
Comm'r of SSA Kilolo Kijakazi and Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
LLOYD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv32539
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL LLOYD
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv11911
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL LLOYD SMITH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Michael Worrell v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al
as 23-12978
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL LLOYD WORRELL
Respondent / Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and FLORIDA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Glen Fallin v. Michael Lloyd, et al
as 23-1824
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GLEN M. FALLIN
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL LLOYD, In His Individual Capacity. CEVA Logistics U.S., Inc. and CEVA LOGISTICS US INC, A Delaware Corporation
Fallin v. Lloyd et al
as 1:2023cv00553
Plaintiff:
Glen M. Fallin
Defendant:
Michael Lloyd and CEVA Logistics U.S., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Lloyd v. Sysco Chicago, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv06760
Plaintiff:
Michael Lloyd
Defendant:
SYSCO CHICAGO, INC. and SYSCO CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
WATSON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv21069
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL LLOYD WATSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
DISHON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv13744
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL LLOYD DISHON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BLOOM v. DOE 1 et al
as 1:2022cv00022
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL LLOYD BLOOM
Defendant:
JOHN DOE 1 and JOHN DOE 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
