Cases 11 - 20 of 47
Home Depot USA IncIn re: Home Depot USA Inc
as 20-2146
Respondent:
LAFARGE NORTH AMERICA INC and MICHAEL M. BAYLSON
Petitioner:
In re: HOME DEPOT USA INC
Public Service Insurance Company v. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2020op45015
Defendant:
Beverly Sackler, Richard S. Sackler, Actavis Kadian LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Public Service Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Julio ChristianIn re: Julio Christian
as 19-3565
Not Yet Classified:
In re: JULIO CHRISTIAN and MICHAEL M. BAYLSON
In Re: Ossie R. Trader
as 17-3703
Defendant - Petitioner:
In re: OSSIE R. TRADER
Plaintiff - Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Not Party - Nominal Respondent:
MICHAEL M. BAYLSON
In Re: Gennaro Rauso
as 17-2589
Defendant - Petitioner:
In re: GENNARO RAUSO
Plaintiff - Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Not Party - Nominal Respondent:
MICHAEL M. BAYLSON
In re: Maurice Nichol
as 17-1939
Defendant - Petitioner:
In re: MAURICE NICHOLS, a/k/a Michael Peterson
Plaintiff - Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Nominal Respondent:
MICHAEL M. BAYLSON
In re: Gennaro Rauso
as 17-1086
Defendant - Petitioner:
In re: GENNARO RAUSO
Plaintiff - Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Not Party - Nominal Respondent:
MICHAEL M. BAYLSON and CLERK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
In re: Maurice Nichol
as 16-4167
Defendant - Petitioner:
In re: MAURICE NICHOLS, a/k/a Michael Peterson
Plaintiff - Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Nominal Respondent:
MICHAEL M. BAYLSON
GOODE v. BAYLSON et al
as 2:2015cv06212
Petitioner:
RONALD GOODE
Respondent:
MICHAEL M. BAYLSON and MICHELE FARRELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
In re: Julio Christian
as 15-3349
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: JULIO CHRISTIAN
Defendant - Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, PENNSYLVANIA PAROLE BOARD and 9TH & 39TH DISTRICT POLICE
Nominal Respondent:
MICHAEL M. BAYLSON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
