Cases 31 - 37 of 37
USA v. Timothy Mitchell
as 09-30169
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
TIMOTHY MICHAEL MITCHELL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv02968
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Javier Bravo, Sr., et al v. City of Santa Maria, et al
as 08-56631
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JAVIER BRAVO, Sr., HOPE BRAVO and E. B., a minor by her Guardian ad Litem Sara Gonzales
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL MITCHELL, in both their personal and official capacities, MITCHELL JAN, Santa Barbara Police SGT, in both their personal and official capacities, ED OLSEN, Santa Barbara Police SGT, in both their personal and official capacities and others
Defendant:
CITY OF SANTA MARIA, DANNY R. MACAGNI, Santa Maria Police Chief, LOUIS TANORE, Santa Maria Police Detective and others
Michael Mitchell v. People of State of California
as 2:2008cv03764
Petitioner:
Michael Mitchell
Respondent:
People of State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Michael Mitchell v. CB Richard Ellis LTD Plan, et al
as 08-55686
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MICHAEL MITCHELL
Defendant - Appellant:
CB RICHARD ELLIS LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN
Defendant-cross-defendant - Appellant:
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant-cross-claimant:
UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Mitchell v. Metropolitan Life, et al
as 08-55277
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MICHAEL MITCHELL
Defendant - Appellant:
CB RICHARD ELLIS LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN
Defendant-cross-defendant - Appellant:
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant-cross-claimant - Appellee:
UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2007cv00015
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
