Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Crews v. Mitchell et al
as 1:2020cv07173
Defendant:
Suburban Trails, Inc., Coach USA, Inc., Michael Mitchell and others
Plaintiff:
Kyle Crews
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pi
Mitchell v. Lilley et al
as 1:2015cv05935
Respondent:
T. Griffin and L. Lilley
Petitioner:
Michael Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pitt v. City of New York et al
as 1:2015cv06657
Defendant:
City of New York, John Does 1-5 and P.O. Michael Mitchell
Plaintiff:
Eon Pitt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Mitchell v. USA
as 1:2015cv01004
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Michael Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Gil v. City of New York et al
as 1:2015cv01709
Defendant:
Det. Patrick Barry, City of New York, John Doe 1-3 and others
Plaintiff:
Jeramy Gil
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mitchell v. State of New York et al
as 9:2014cv00934
Plaintiff:
Michael Mitchell
Defendant:
State of New York, Thomas LaValley, John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell et al v. The Standard Fire Insurance Company
as 2:2014cv00222
Defendant:
Great Northern Insurance Company and The Standard Fire Insurance Company
Amicu:
Jared Todd Greisman
Plaintiff:
Michael Mitchell and Cynthia Zajac
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4072 Payment of Flood Insurance Claim
Mitchell v. Siersma et al
as 6:2014cv06069
Plaintiff:
Patrick Michael Mitchell
Defendant:
Robert Siersma and Samuel Soprano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell v. Siersma et al
as 1:2013cv00730
Plaintiff:
Patrick Michael Mitchell
Defendant:
Robert Siersma, Samuel Soprano, Eric J. Hurd, Esq. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Braselmann et al
as 1:2013cv00150
Plaintiff:
Michael Mitchell
Defendant:
Peter Braselmann, John Doe and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
