Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Mackey v. Moores et al
as 1:2024cv00761
Plaintiff:
Bakari Mackey
Defendant:
Michael Moores and Rebecca Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moore v. Officer Finley et al
as 2:2023cv01654
Plaintiff:
Michael Moore
Defendant:
Officer Finley, Officer Moise, Officer Garrett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00897
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 ad - Americans with Disabilities Act
BRIJMOHAN v. WATSON et al
as 1:2021cv00185
Plaintiff:
SEAN JEFFREY BRIJMOHAN
Defendant:
CLOVIS WATSON, JR, LINDA J STUMP-KURNICK, AARON BRAMI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00162
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
JOHNSON v. GIBSON et al
as 3:2020cv00064
Defendant:
SERGEANT JOHN OR JANE DOE, SHERIFF MICHAEL MOORE, LIEUTENANT JASON LUKE and others
Plaintiff:
FARRELL DEMITA JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TRAMMELL v. MOORE et al
as 5:2017cv00295
Plaintiff:
JOHN A TRAMMELL
Defendant:
MICHAEL MOORE and JAMES BAKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ricky Giddens, et al v. Hugh Lawson, et al
as 17-10169
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICKY GIDDENS and LYDIA GIDDENS
Defendant - Appellee:
HUGH LAWSON, Senior District Judge, W. LOUIS SANDS, Senior District Judge, THOMAS Q. LANGSTAFF, Magistrate Judge and others
GIDDENS et al v. LAWSON et al
as 7:2015cv00099
Plaintiff:
RICKY GIDDENS and LYDIA GIDDENS
Defendant:
HUGH LAWSON, W LOUIS SANDS, THOMAS Q LANGSTAFF and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lyttle v. The United States of America et al
as 4:2011cv00152
Plaintiff:
Mark Daniel Lyttle
Defendant:
The United States of America , ERIC HOLDER , JANET NAPOLITANO and others
Respondent:
Tracy Moten
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
