Cases 1 - 10 of 106
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2011cv00337
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
DAZA-VALENZUELA v. MUKASEY et al
as 2:2009cv01363
Petitioner:
JOSE LUIS DAZA-VALENZUELA
Respondent:
Michael Mukasey, Michael Chertoff, THOMAS R. DECKER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv01824
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Type:
Prisoner Petitions
Mends v. Chertoff et al
as 4:2009cv00333
Petitioner:
Nick Mends
Respondent:
Michael Chertoff, Michael Mukasey, Raymond Simonse and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00029
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Champagne v. Mukasey et al
as 4:2009cv00064
Petitioner:
Fritz Champagne
Respondent:
Michael Mukasey, Michael Chertoff, David Venturella and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Watson v. The United States of America et al
as 2:2009cv00019
Plaintiff:
Teddy A. Watson
Defendant:
The United States of America, The State of Alabama, Jere L. Beasley and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Gustave v. United States of America et al
as 1:2009cv00041
Petitioner:
Patrick Gustave
Respondent:
United States of America, Frank Sizer, Raymond Simonse and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Habeas Corpus:INS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv03835
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Castano v. Chertoff et al
as 6:2008cv02116
Plaintiff:
Carlos Andres Castano
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, David Roark, Jonathan Scharfen and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
