Cases 1 - 10 of 91
Jenkins v. Apker et al
as 4:2011cv00472
Petitioner:
Randy Jenkins
Respondent:
Craig Apker, Harley G Lappin, Unknown Party and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Gomis v. Murry et al
as 5:2009cv00930
Plaintiff:
Antoine Gomis
Defendant:
Anthony S. Murry, Alberto R. Gonzales, Thomas Ward Hussey and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00197
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Garcia v. Holder, et al
as 2:2009cv00096
Petitioner:
Nicanor Mejia Garcia and Nicanor Mejia Garcia
Respondent:
Michael Mukasey and Neil Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2009cv00051
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Martinez-Palacios v. Mukasey
as 2:2009cv00011
Petitioner:
Hovard Martinez-Palacios
Respondent:
Michael Mukasey
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Garcia v. Chertoff et al
as 5:2008cv05729
Petitioner:
Aracely De Jesus Fajard Garcia
Respondent:
Michael Chertoff, Nancy Alcantar and Michael Mukasey
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Abpikar v. Chertoff et al
as 5:2008cv05661
Petitioner:
Hassan Abpikar
Respondent:
Michael Chertoff, Michael Mukasey, Robin F. Baker and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jomat Gary Ermando v. Michael Mukasey
as 2:2008cv08290
Petitioner:
Jomat Gary Ermando
Respondent:
Michael Mukasey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Elda Mejia-Espinoza et al v. Michael Mukasey et al
as 2:2008cv07984
Petitioner:
Elda Mejia-Espinoza and Jorge Luis Orozco-Mejia
Respondent:
Michael Mukasey, Michael Mukasey, Michael Chertoff and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
