Other Statutes Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 191
El Paso Natural Gas Company v. USA, et al
as 10-5090
Plaintiff - Appellee: El Paso Natural Gas Company
Intervenor For Plaintiff - Appellant: Navajo Nation
Defendant - Appellee: United States of America, United States Department of Energy, Samuel W. Bodman and others
El Paso Natural Gas Company v. USA, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-5080
Plaintiff - Appellant: El Paso Natural Gas Company
Intervenor For Plaintiff - Appellee: Navajo Nation
Defendant - Appellee: United States of America, United States Department of Energy, Samuel W. Bodman and others
ROGUE VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER v. THOMPSON We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2003cv00477
Plaintiff: ROGUE VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER
Defendant: MICHAEL O. LEAVITT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
County of Sacramento, et al v. Dorothy Andrews, et al
as 10-80062
Plaintiff - Respondent: WILTON MIWOK RANCHERIA, a formerly federally-recognized Indian Tribe, Its Members, ME-WUK INDIAN COMMUNITY OF THE WILTON RANCHERIA and DOROTHY ANDREWS
Defendant - Respondent: DIRK KEMPTHORNE, Secretary of the Department of Interior, CARL J. ARTMAN, Assistant SEcretary of for Indian Affairs of the United States Department of Interior, THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR and others
Intervenor-Defendant - Petitioner: COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA and CITY OF ELK GROVE, CALIFORNIA
Rhode Island Hospital v. Leavitt, et al
as 10-1116
Plaintiff - Appellee: RHODE ISLAND HOSPITAL
Defendant - Appellant: MICHAEL O. LEAVITT, in his capacity as Secretary of Health and Human Services and DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Me-Wuk Indian Community of the Wilton Rancheria et al v. Kempthorne et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2007cv05706
Plaintiff: Me-Wuk Indian Community of the Wilton Rancheria
Defendant: Dirk Kempthorne , Carl J. Artman , United States Department of Interior and others
Intervenor_dft: County of Sacramento, California and City of Elk Grove
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Medical Center Pharmacy, et al v. Eric Holder, Jr., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-50031
Plaintiff - Appellant: MEDICAL CENTER PHARMACY, APPLIED PHARMACY, COLLEGE PHARMACY and others
Defendant - Appellee: JOHN ASHCROFT, U S ATTORNEY GENERAL, In his official capacity as Attorney General, United States Department of Justice, ERIC H HOLDER, JR., In his official capacity as Attorney General, United States Department of Justice, KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, Secretary, HHS, In her official capacity as Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services and others
Adelaida B. Antonio v. United States of America et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2008cv04526
Plaintiff: Adelaida B. Antonio
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue, Attorney General of the United States of America, Department of Health Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Recovery of Debt to US
Doctors Nursing Rehabilitation v. Kathleen Sebelius We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-2226
Plaintiff - Appellant: DOCTORS NURSING & REHABILITATION CENTER
Defendant - Appellee: MICHAEL O. LEAVITT, Secretary of Health and Human Services, United States Department of Health and Human Services and KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, Secretary of Health and Human Services, United States Department of Health and Human Services
Phoenix Memorial Hospital, et al v. Michael Leavitt We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-15506
Plaintiff - Appellant: PHOENIX MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, CASA GRANDE REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER and others
Defendant - Appellee: MICHAEL O. LEAVITT, in his official capacity as Secretary, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Amicus Curiae: QUALITY REIMBURSEMENT SERVICES

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?