Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Marinkovic v. Osborne, et al
as 20-2141
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL OSBORNE, CREDIT ADJUSTMENTS, INC., LISA BLOOMFIELD and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MELVIN M. MARINKOVIC
Marinkovic v. Osborne, et al
as 20-1393
Defendant / Appellee:
BETSY DEVOS, Secretary, US Department of Education, MICHAEL OSBORNE, LISA BLOOMFIELD and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MELVIN M. MARINKOVIC
Robert Holleman v. Dushan Zatecky, et al
as 19-1326
Defendant / Appellee:
DUSHAN ZATECKY, Superintendent, indvidually and in his official capacity as Superintendent of Pendleton Correctional Facility, MICHAEL OSBORN, Classification Analyst, Indiana Department of Correction, in his official and individual capacity, RICHARD BROWN, Superintendent of the Wabash Correctional Facility and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT LEE HOLLEMAN
Osborn v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
as 1:2017cv21660
Plaintiff:
Michael Osborn
Defendant:
Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
OSBORN v. VOLKSWAGEN GROUP OF AMERICA, INC.
as 5:2017cv01645
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL OSBORN
Defendant:
VOLKSWAGEN GROUP OF AMERICA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
USA v. Michael Osborne
as 15-6030
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL OSBORNE
Osborne v. Santander Consumer USA, Inc.
as 8:2015cv02011
Plaintiff:
Michael Osborne
Defendant:
Santander Consumer USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
USA v. Michael Osborne
as 14-5260
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL OSBORNE
Comprehensive Community Development Corp. et al v. Sibelius et al
as 1:2012cv00776
Plaintiff:
Comprehensive Community Development Corp. , The Board of Directors of Comprehensive Community Development Corp. , Charlotte McDuffie and others
Defendant:
Kathleen Sibelius , James Macrae , Suganthi Walter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
