Cases 31 - 40 of 41
Amador v. Philllips
as 4:2011cv00590
Plaintiff:
Ernest Amador
Defendant:
Michael Phillips, Troy J Tally and Corrections Corporation of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phillips v. ENGlobal Corporation
as 4:2010cv02422
Plaintiff:
Michael Phillips
Defendant:
ENGlobal Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5
Brown et al v. Stephen L. LaFrance Pharmacy, Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv00211
Plaintiff:
Mattie D. Brown and James A. Brown
Defendant:
Stephen L. LaFrance Pharmacy, Inc. , Super D #26 , Michael Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Carroll v. Executive Director - TDCJ-ID et al
as 4:2009cv00640
Plaintiff:
Randy Lorine Carroll
Defendant:
Executive Director - TDCJ-ID, Michael Phillips and NFN Daughtery
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Micheal Phillips v. A. Castillo, et al
as 08-20784
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL PHILLIPS
Defendant - Appellee:
A. CASTILLO, Senior Warden of Etelle Unit, GUNNELL, Assistant Warden, Estelle Unit, K. MAYFIELD, Assistant Regional Director of TDCJ-TID and others
Phillips v. Quarterman
as 08-20376
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL PHILLIPS
Respondent - Appellee:
NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Phillips v. Fuselier et al
as 6:2008cv00720
Plaintiff:
Michael Phillips
Defendant:
Chase Fuselier and Wood Group
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Phillips v. Quarterman
as 4:2008cv01418
Petitioner:
Michael Phillips
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Phillips v. Quarterman
as 08-40220
Petitioner - Appellant:
ERIC MICHAEL PHILLIPS
Respondent - Appellee:
NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Salinas v. Phillips et al
as 4:2007cv00447
Plaintiff:
Alberto Salinas
Defendant:
Michael Phillips, Craig Scott, Martin Frink and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
