Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Willie Payne v. Daryl Hammond et al
as 2:2016cv04056
Defendant:
Does, Daryl Hammond and Michael Powell
Plaintiff:
Willie Payne
Powell et al. v. Department of Child Support Services et al.
as 2:2016cv01197
Plaintiff:
Michael Powell, Tomery Darling, Livvy Powell and others
Defendant:
Department of Child Support Services, Superior Court of California Placer County, Dirk Amara and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Hildene Opportunities Master Fund, Ltd. v. Beneficial State Bancorp Inc. et al
as 3:2016mc00287
Plaintiff:
Amy Mitchell, Ch. 7 Trustee for Albina Community Bancorp, D. Or. Bkcy. Case 14-35284-rld7 and Hildene Opportunities Master Fund, Ltd.
Defendant:
Beneficial State Bancorp Inc., Graham Bryce, Duncan Campbell and others
503) 778-5299 (fax:
Joseph M. Van Leuven
Powell v. Darling
as 2:2016cv01047
Plaintiff:
Michael Powell
Defendant:
Tomery Darling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Powell v. State of Oregon
as 6:2016cv00528
Petitioner:
David Michael Powell
Respondent:
State of Oregon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mesa et al v. Volkswagen A.G. et al
as 3:2015cv06161
Plaintiff:
Waldo Mesa and Michael Powell
Defendant:
Volkswagen A.G. and Volkswagen Group of America Inc
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Powell v. Angelozzi
as 3:2012cv02278
Respondent:
Mr. Rick Angelozzi
Petitioner:
David Michael Powell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
USA v. James Barclay
as 12-50462
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JAMES MICHAEL BARCLAY, AKA Joseph Edgar, AKA James Michael Powell, AKA Joseph Edgar Powell, AKA Joseph Edger Powell
USA v. James Barclay
as 12-50459
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JAMES MICHAEL BARCLAY, AKA Joseph Edgar, AKA James Michael Powell, AKA Joseph Edgar Powell, AKA Joseph Edger Powell
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
