Cases 31 - 40 of 81
Conley v. SSA
as 7:2014cv00141
Plaintiff:
Michael Ray Conley
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
DeSpain v. City of Louisville et al
as 3:2014cv00602
Plaintiff:
Michael Ray DeSpain
Defendant:
City of Louisville, Steven Conrad, Kit Stemile and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spakes et al v. National Strategic Protective Services, LLC (TV3)
as 3:2014cv00365
Plaintiff:
Tommy Spakes , Alvin Arnwine , Daniel Barnes and others
Defendant:
National Strategic Protective Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Spakes et al v. G4S Government Solutions, Inc.
as 3:2014cv00349
Plaintiff:
Tommy Spakes , Alvin Arnwine , Daniel Barnes and others
Defendant:
G4S Government Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Acuff et al v. G4S Government Solutions, Inc.
as 3:2014cv00337
Plaintiff:
Bryan Acuff , Gabriel Archer , Michael Ashe and others
Defendant:
G4S Government Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Joe Browder, Jr. v. Ky State Prison Officials, et al
as 13-6659
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOE ALEXANDER BROWDER, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
KENTUCKY STATE PRISON OFFICIALS, John Does and Jane Does, PHILLIP PARKER, Warden, JOHN DOE, President of Correctcare Integrated Health, Inc. and others
USA v. McCollum et al
as 5:2013cv00410
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Melissa A. McCollum, Michael Ray Brumfield and Citi Financial, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Randy Haight, et al v. LaDonna Thompson, et al
as 13-6005
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RANDY HAIGHT, ROBERT CARL FOLEY, ROGER EPPERSON and others
Defendant - Appellee:
LADONNA H. THOMPSON, Commissioner, D.O.C., JAMES L. ERWIN, Warden, Director of Operations/Programs, D.O.C., AL C. PARKE, Warden, Deputy Commissioner, D.O.C. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv02947
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
