Cases 51 - 60 of 774
Wright v. USA
as 6:2023cv00114
Petitioner:
Michael Ray Wright
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Chiles et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv01238
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Willie Jerome Chiles, Dennis Joseph Cardoza, Benjamin Franklin Carey, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
(PC) Fowler v. Miller et al
as 2:2023cv00248
Plaintiff:
Michael Ray Fowler
Defendant:
Miller, J. Begines and Bieniaviaes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Alford v. USA
as 23-10196
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL RAY ALFORD
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Clark v. Trisler et al
as 1:2022cv00559
Plaintiff:
Jason Ray Clark
Defendant:
Michael Ray Trisler, Brian Paul Trisler, Steven Wayne Trisler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Amighetti v. Childress et al
as 6:2023cv00316
Plaintiff:
Luis Amighetti
Defendant:
Michael Ray Childress and Double CC Trucking, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Michael Alford v. USA
as 22-14318
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL RAY ALFORD
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Michael Thomas v. Adam Douglas
as 22-2121
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL RAY THOMAS
Respondent / Appellee:
ADAM DOUGLAS, Acting Warden, Saginaw Correctional Facility
MCCORMICK v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv01906
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL RAY MCCORMICK
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bryan v. Syngenta AG et al
as 3:2022pq03075
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Michael Ray Bryan
Defendant:
Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC and Chevron U.S.A. Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
