Cases filed in Maryland
Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Ademiluyi v. Judge Sheila Tillerson Adams et al
as 8:2023cv03526
Plaintiff: Judge April Ademiluyi
Defendant: Judge Sheila Tillerson Adams, Judge Daneeka Varner Cotton and Judge Michael Ray Pearson
Intervenor: George McDermott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Stemple v. Maryland DOC et al
as 1:2023cv03138
Plaintiff: Michael Ray Stemple
Defendant: Maryland DOC, DPSCS, DOC Medical and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Stemple v. Commissioner of Corrections for the State of Maryland
as 1:2022cv01513
Petitioner: Michael Ray Stemple
Respondent: Commissioner of Corrections for the State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stemple v. Warden
as 1:2022cv00866
Plaintiff: Michael Ray Stemple
Defendant: Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv03505
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stemple v. Warden We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv01117
Defendant: Warden
Plaintiff: Michael Ray Stemple
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Stemple v. Warden
as 1:2018cv02389
Defendant: Warden
Plaintiff: Michael Ray Stemple
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Stemple v. Warden of MCI-H et al
as 1:2017cv01782
Plaintiff: Michael Ray Stemple
Defendant: Warden of MCI-H and Calvin Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stemple v. Warden We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv01539
Plaintiff: Michael Ray Stemple
Defendant: Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stemple v. Warden We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv01500
Petitioner: Michael Ray Stemple
Respondent: Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?