Cases 31 - 40 of 49
Roberts v. Strong
as 5:2012cv06150
Plaintiff:
Brandon Michael Roberts
Defendant:
Mike Strong
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roberts v. Scroggins
as 5:2012cv06141
Plaintiff:
Brandon Michael Roberts
Defendant:
Dwight K Scroggins, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roberts v. Taylor
as 5:2012cv06138
Plaintiff:
Brandon Michael Roberts
Defendant:
Randal Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roberts v. Zeit
as 5:2012cv06139
Plaintiff:
Brandon Michael Roberts
Defendant:
Kristina S Zeit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roberts v. Buchanan County Sheriff's Department et al
as 5:2012cv06101
Plaintiff:
Brandon Michael Roberts
Defendant:
Buchanan County Sheriff's Department and Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mescall v. University Medical Center et al
as 2:2012cv00927
Defendant:
Esq. Danae Adams, Franklin Akioyame, Ralph Aquino and others
Plaintiff:
Randall Mescall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mubashshir et al v. Moore et al
as 3:2010cv02802
Plaintiff:
Mujtabaa L. Mubashshir, Gibreal Jallow, Michael Robert and others
Defendant:
Ernie Moore, Edward Sheldon, Jaquelyn Burns and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mubashshir et al v. Moore et al
as 3:2010cv02591
Plaintiff:
Mujtabaa L. Mubashshir, Gibreal Jallow, Michael Robert and others
Defendant:
Ernie Moore, Warren Burbury, Jaquelyn Burn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mubashshir et al
as 3:2010cv02501
Plaintiff:
Mujtabaa L. Mubashshir, Gibreal Jallow, Michael Robert and others
Defendant:
Ernie Moore, Warren Burbury, Jaquelyn Burn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hiscox v. Martel et al
as 2:2010cv00467
Plaintiff:
Michael Robert Hiscox
Defendant:
Mike Martel, J. Armstrong, K. Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
