Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Logan v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv03897
Plaintiff:
Leonard Logan
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Glenn Evans, Alejandro Almazan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rowan v. USA
as 3:2023cv00728
Plaintiff:
Michael Rowan
Defendant:
Kandyce Rowan, USA and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
ROWAN v. Travelers Casualty Insurance Company of America
as 5:2022cv00489
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ROWAN
Defendant:
Travelers Casualty Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Knutson v. Williams
as 3:2022cv01599
Petitioner:
Michael Rowan Knutson
Respondent:
E. Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
United States v. Michael Knutson
as 22-1346
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Michael Rowan Knutson, also known as Michael Rowan Clark
Knutson v. Williams
as 3:2020cv00349
Petitioner:
Michael Rowan Knutson
Respondent:
E. Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Knutson v. United States of America
as 4:2019cv00296
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Michael Rowan Knutson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Bolden v. Pesavento et al.
as 1:2017cv00417
Plaintiff:
Bolden, Eddie L. Bolden and Beligratis, Walls, Walsh
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Michael Baker, George Karl and others
Not Classified By Court:
Cook County States Attorney's Office and Walls, Beligratis, Walsh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Karl Dang, et al v. Inspection Depot, Inc., et al
as 16-15153
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KARL DANG, and other similarly situated individuals and JOANNE DULWICK
Defendant - Appellee:
INSPECTION DEPOT, INC., a Florida corporation and MICHAEL ROWAN, Individually
:
CITIZENS PROPERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION
Michael Knutson v. United State
as 16-2400
Petitioner:
Michael Rowan Knutson
Respondent:
United States of America
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
