Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Caddell et al v. Obion County Detention Center et al
as 1:2023cv01011
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Caddell, Deandre" Pickering, Gary Baker and others
Defendant:
Obion County Detention Center, Carl Jackson, Kent Treece and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SHARP et al v. CONYERS et al
as 1:2022cv02425
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SHARP
Defendant:
REINHARDT, CHRISTINA CONYERS, IRENE O. IGLIONOSA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bond v. Treece et al
as 1:2022cv01113
Plaintiff:
Montario D. Bond
Defendant:
Kent Treece, Kasye Kissell, Michael Cain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bond v. Cain et al
as 1:2022cv01109
Plaintiff:
Montario D. Bond
Defendant:
Michael Cain, Ava Little and Michael Sharp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bond v. Maddox et al
as 1:2022cv01085
Plaintiff:
Montario D. Bond
Defendant:
Lindsey Maddox, Michael Sharp, Ava Little and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bond v. Little et al
as 1:2022cv01080
Plaintiff:
Montario D. Bond
Defendant:
Ava Little, Michael Sharp and Karl Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Sharp et al
as 3:2019cv00471
Plaintiff:
Rickie Hill
Defendant:
R. Dugan, H Wickham, Renee Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Baker et al
as 3:2019cv00450
Defendant:
H. Wickham, R. Baker, Renee Baker and others
Plaintiff:
Rickie L. Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Wickham et al
as 3:2019cv00444
Defendant:
H. Wickham, R. Dugan, Renee Baker and others
Plaintiff:
Rickie L. Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHARP v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 1:2018cv00502
Miscellaneou:
PENDLETON CF (Court Use Only)
Petitioner:
MICHAEL SHARP
Respondent:
STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
