Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Shephard v. City of New York et al
as 1:2025cv01314
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SHEPHARD
Defendant:
CITY OF NEW YORK and JERRY BOWENS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Dale Saxon et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv05676
Plaintiff:
Andrew Scalf, Kathlyn Scuderi, Jocelynn Schmalzer and others
Defendant:
The 3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Saxon et al v. The 3M Company et al
as NYS/1:24-cv-06998
Defendant:
The 3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co., AGC Chemicals Americas Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Dale Saxon, Thomas Sayers, Andrew Scalf and others
Saxon et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 1:2024cv06998
Plaintiff:
James Shegstad, Dennis Schlechtweg, Michael Shephard and others
Defendant:
AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Amerex Corporation, Arkema Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 nr Notice of Removal
Belton Monroe et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2022cv05022
Plaintiff:
Belton Monroe, Jessica Monroe, Greg Moore and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Monroe et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00815
Plaintiff:
Belton Monroe, Jessica Monroe, Greg Moore and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Monroe et al v. Ford Motor Company
as DE/1:22-CV-00815
Plaintiff:
Monroe, Belton Monroe, Jessica Monroe and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Dickman v. US Bancorp et al
as 1:2018cv00164
Plaintiff:
Frank Karl Dickman, Jr.
Defendant:
US Bancorp, Richard Davis, Andrew Cecede and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Phillip A. Giuffre v. P.O. Karen Jefferson
as 1:2014cv03692
Plaintiff:
Phillip A. Giuffre
Movant:
Gregory E. Kulis & Associates, Ltd.
Defendant:
P.O. Karen Jefferson, P.O. AMY HURLEY #19490, P.O. MICHAEL SHEPHARD #9736 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
