Cases 11 - 20 of 37
Carlson v. CoreLogic, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv01879
Defendant:
Claudia Fan Munce, W. Steve Albrecht, Jaynie Miller Studenmund and others
Plaintiff:
Kathryn Carlson
JUSTICE v. CORELOGIC, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv01542
Defendant:
CLAUDIA FAN MUNCE, W. STEVE ALBRECHT, JAYNIE MILLER STUDENMUND and others
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY D. JUSTICE, II.
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Kent v. CoreLogic, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00473
Plaintiff:
Michael Kent
Defendant:
Douglas C. Curling, Jaynie Miller Studenmund, Wendy Lane and others
Morgan v. CoreLogic, Inc. et al
as 8:2021cv00581
Defendant:
Claudia Fan Munce, Douglas C. Curling, Jaynie Miller Studenmund and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Morgan
Morse v. CoreLogic, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00770
Defendant:
Claudia Fan Munce, Douglas C. Curling, Jaynie Miller Studenmund and others
Plaintiff:
Irwin Morse
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 Securities Exchange Act
Stein v. CoreLogic, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv01948
Defendant:
Claudia Fan Munce, Douglas C. Curling, Jaynie Miller Studenmund and others
Plaintiff:
Shiva Stein
SHEPHERD v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC et al
as 3:2021cv01894
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC and JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SHEPHERD
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SHEPHERD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv66599
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SHEPHERD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shepherd v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 3:2017cv01389
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Michael Shepherd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Shepherd v. SSA
as 6:2017cv00141
Plaintiff:
Michael Shepherd
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
