Cases 31 - 40 of 60
Smith v. Ahmed et al
as 1:2014cv08106
Plaintiff:
Michael Smith
Defendant:
A. Ahmed, Nelly, Cordero and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2014cv00510
Plaintiff:
Justin Michael Smith
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Smith et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2014cv03582
Defendant:
City of New York, John Doe #1-2 and Police Officer Frank Muzikar
Plaintiff:
Ernest Randall and Michael Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doyle et al v. The City of New York
as 1:2014cv02831
Plaintiff:
Aidan Doyle and Michael Smith
Defendant:
The City of New York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00186
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Smith v. Uno Restaurant Holdings Corporation
as 6:2014cv00228
Plaintiff:
Michael Smith
Defendant:
Uno Restaurant Holdings Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Walker v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2014cv00706
Shield No. Unknown:
Police Officer Gregory Gordon
Defendant:
Police Michael Smith and The City of New York
Plaintiff:
Michael Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Walker v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2014cv00680
Defendant:
Police Officer Gregory Gordon, Michael Smith and The City of New York
Plaintiff:
Micael Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gabbard v. H&R Block, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv08950
Plaintiff:
Jason D. Gabbard
Defendant:
H&R Block, Inc. , Carolyn Houghton, Rosetta Callebs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Smith et al v. Overhead Doors of Albany, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv01336
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Smith and Michael Smith
Defendant:
Overhead Doors of Albany, Inc., David Ripley and Ken Harrington
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
