Cases 11 - 20 of 70
Lundahl v. Smith et al
as 4:2023cv00632
Plaintiff:
Holli Telford Lundahl
Defendant:
Warden Michael Smith and Collette Peters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Steward v. Smith et al
as 4:2023cv00633
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Steward
Defendant:
Warden Michael Smith and Collette Peters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelley v. Smith
as 4:2023cv00434
Petitioner:
Margaret Kelley
Respondent:
Warden Michael Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Lang v. Smith
as 4:2023cv00252
Petitioner:
Barbara Lang
Respondent:
Michael Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Blake et al v. Warden Smith
as 4:2023cv00238
Petitioner:
Faith Blake and Barbara Lang
Respondent:
Warden Smith, United States of America and Michael Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Barker v. Smith
as 4:2023cv00012
Petitioner:
Christeena Janell Barker
Respondent:
Warden Michael Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Norman v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 4:2022cv01041
Plaintiff:
Alexis C Norman
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Michael Smith and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Horelica v. Smith, Warden FMC-Carswell
as 4:2022cv00856
Petitioner:
Charlotte Horelica
Respondent:
Warden FMC Carswell and Michael Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01827
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Poff v. Smith et al
as 4:2022cv00491
Plaintiff:
Julia Ann Poff
Defendant:
Warden Michael Smith and Captain FNU Buckner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
