Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Lujan v. U.S. Bank et al
as 1:2019cv00139
Defendant:
Access Behavioral Health Services, Inc, U.S. Bank, Lauri Stori and others
Plaintiff:
Michael V Lujan and Lujan's Bookkeeping Services Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COVAS et al v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY et al
as 3:2018cv02072
Plaintiff:
VALERIE L. LINDSEY, MICHAEL V. LUJAN, ANNETTE MCMILLAN and others
Defendant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, OTSUKA PHARMACEUTICAL CO LTD and OTSUKA AMERICA PHARMACEUTICAL INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Covas et al v. Bristol Myers Squibb Company et al
as 1:2018cv01248
Plaintiff:
Valerie L. Lindsey, Michael V. Lujan, Annette McMillan and others
Defendant:
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Otsuka America Pharmaceutical, Inc. and Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Michael Lujan v. Chase Bank, et al
as 12-15626
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL V. LUJAN
Defendant - Appellee:
CHASE BANK, J.P. MORGAN and ASHLEY STEVENS
Lujan v. Chase Bank, et al
as 2:2012cv00007
Plaintiff:
Michael V. Lujan
Defendant:
Chase Bank, J.P. Morgan and Ashley Stevens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lujan v. Siegfried and Jensen et al
as 2:2011cv00635
Plaintiff:
Michael V. Lujan
Defendant:
Siegfried and Jensen, Miller Law Firm, Utah State Prison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Lujan v. James Yate
as 11-16258
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL V. LUJAN
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES YATES, Warden
Lujan v. Dreis, et al
as 10-4093
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL V. LUJAN
Defendant - Appellee:
FRED RICHARD DREIS, DAVIS COUNTY JAIL, VALLEY MENTAL HEALTH and others
Lujan v. Dreis et al
as 2:2010cv00160
Plaintiff:
Michael V. Lujan
Defendant:
Fred R. Dreis, Utah State Prison, Davis County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Lujan v. James Yate
as 09-16767
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL V. LUJAN
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES YATES, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
