Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Etienne v. Edmark
as 23-1946
Petitioner / Appellant:
DICKENS ETIENNE
Respondent / Appellee:
MICHELLE EDMARK, Warden, NH State Prison
Kidd v. Mattis et al
as 1:2022cv00562
Plaintiff:
Kerry W. Kidd
Defendant:
Paula Mattis, Thomas Groblewski, Cherie Ertna and others
Not Classified By Court:
NH Attorney General - Notice Only - Civil (Court Use Only) and NH Department of Corrections - Notice Only - Civil (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Avery v. St. Germain, et al
as 22-1971
Petitioner / Appellant:
EDGAR CLIFFORD AVERY, JR.
Respondent / Appellee:
ASHLYN ST. GERMAIN, DONNA STYEK, BRIAN CASHMAN and others
Holloway v. Edmark
as 22-1922
Petitioner / Appellant:
DALE E. HOLLOWAY, JR.
Respondent / Appellee:
MICHELLE EDMARK, Warden, New Hampshire State Prison
Gray v. Bergstedt, et al
as 22-1777
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEFFREY MARTIN GRAY
Defendant / Appellee:
INGJERD BERGSTEDT and DAVID ANZEL
Defendant:
PAUL LEVY, JOHN PERKINS, WILLIAM L. WRENN, Former Commissioner, NH Department of Corrections and others
Britton v. Edmark
as 22-1634
Petitioner / Appellant:
GARY BRITTON
Respondent / Appellee:
MICHELLE EDMARK, Warden, NH State Prison
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00290
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)
Breest v. Edmark
as 22-1568
Petitioner / Appellant:
ROBERT BREEST
Respondent / Appellee:
MICHELLE EDMARK, Warden, NH State Prison
Gibbs v. NH Department of Corrections, Commissioner et al
as 1:2022fp00154
Defendant:
NH Department of Corrections, Commissioner, NH State Prison for Men, Warden, Helen Hanks and others
Plaintiff:
Peter E. Gibbs
Not Classified By Court:
NH Attorney General - Notice Only - Civil (Court Use Only) and NH Department of Corrections - Notice Only - Civil (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
