Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Cottrell v. Michigan Department of State Police et al
as 1:2022cv00052
Plaintiff:
Napoleon Lamarr Cottrell
Defendant:
Michigan Department of State Police and United States Department of Education
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White #285964 v. Michigan, State of et al
as 1:2018cv00224
Plaintiff:
Kala White #285964
Defendant:
Michigan, State of, Michigan Department of State Police, Michigan Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White v. Michigan, State of et al
as 3:2018cv00438
Plaintiff:
Kala B. White
Defendant:
Michigan, State of, State of Michigan Department of State Police, State of Michigan Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Darryl Dudley El v. MDOC, et al
as 17-1220
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRYL DUDLEY EL
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DONALD RUSSELL MAKOWSKI, KENNETH JEROLD ROBINSON, Warden and others
Dudley El v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2014cv11927
Plaintiff:
Darryl Dudley El
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Donald Makowski, Kenneth Robinson and others
Solomon v. Wayne County Corporation et al
as 2:2011cv12330
Plaintiff:
Martin Solomon
Defendant:
Wayne County Corporation, Bode Technology Incorporated, Jacquelyn Stasiak and others
Michael Gresham v. MDOC, et al
as 09-1469
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL GRESHAM, State/Federal Government Informant Agent (Certified) Legal Assistant Human Right Activist Suing in Capacity
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, MUNISING MEMORIAL HOSPITAL and others
Daniel #537193 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2008cv00160
Plaintiff:
Allen D. Daniel #537193
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Office of Administrative Hearings, Jeri-Ann Sherry and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
