Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Corey Blocker v. Robert Jonker, et al
as 23-2002
Plaintiff / Appellant:
COREY DESHON BLOCKER
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERT J. JONKER, MICHIGAN UNEMPLOYMENT AGENCY, HUNTINGTON BANK and others
Jones v. UIA et al
as 2:2023cv12460
Plaintiff:
Shantae M. Jones
Defendant:
UIA, Staff Nexus UIA Case, Susan R. Corbin and others
Blocker v. Jonker et al
as 1:2023cv01019
Plaintiff:
RESTRICTED FILER Corey Blocker
Defendant:
Robert J. Jonker, Michigan Unemployment Agency, Huntington Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Corey Blocker v. Robert Jonker, et al
as 23-1506
Plaintiff / Appellant:
COREY DESHON BLOCKER
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERT J. JONKER, MICHIGAN UNEMPLOYMENT AGENCY, HUNTINGTON BANK and others
Blocker v. Jonker et al
as 1:2023cv00446
Plaintiff:
RESTRICTED FILER Corey Blocker
Defendant:
Robert J. Jonker, Michigan Unemployment Agency, Bank Huntington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Blocker v. Jonker et al
as 1:2023cv00283
Plaintiff:
RESTRICTED FILER Corey Blocker
Defendant:
Robert J. Jonker, Michigan Unemployment Agency, Huntington Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Blocker v. Jonker et al
as 1:2023cv00006
Plaintiff:
RESTRICTED FILER Corey Blocker
Defendant:
Robert J. Jonker, Michigan Unemployment Agency, Huntington Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
v. Gibbs et al
as 2:2022cv12668
Plaintiff:
Maurice Gibbs
Defendant:
Michigan Unemployment Agency and Julia Dale
Corey Blocker v. Robert Jonker, et al
as 22-1626
Plaintiff / Appellant:
COREY DESHON BLOCKER
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERT J. JONKER, STATE OF MICHIGAN, GRETCHEN WHITMER and others
Corey Blocker v. Robert Jonker, et al
as 22-1468
Plaintiff / Appellant:
COREY DESHON BLOCKER
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERT J. JONKER, STATE OF MICHIGAN, GRETCHEN WHITMER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
