Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Simon Gebregziabher v. Christopher Tanner
as 22-1077
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Simon Gebregziabher
Defendant:
Francis G. Slay, Mayor and Board of Police Commissioners, Official Capacity, Richard Gray, Board of Police Commissioners, Official Capacity, Thomas Irwin, Board of Police Commissioners, Official Capacity and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Christopher Tanner, Detective, Individual Capacity
Alex Nelson, et al v. City of St. Louis, Missouri, et al
as 21-3740
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Alex Nelson and Iris Nelson
Defendant / Appellant:
City of St. Louis, Missouri, Gerald Leyshock, COI, in his individual and official capacities, Scott Boyher, LT., in his individual and official capacities and others
Defendant:
John Does 1-5, in their individual and official capacities, Charlene Deeken and John Does, 1-3
Gebregziabher v. Slay et al
as 4:2019cv00470
Defendant:
Marcus Bush, Richard Gray, Matthew Burle and others
Plaintiff:
Simon Gebregziabher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dethrow v. St. Louis City Metropolitan Police Department et al
as 4:2017cv00274
Plaintiff:
Irving Dethrow
Defendant:
St. Louis City Metropolitan Police Department, Sam Dotson, Jason L. Brandhorst and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Smith v. City of St. Louis, et al
as 16-1238
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Michael Smith
Defendant - Appellee:
City of St. Louis, City of St. Louis Police Department, Stephen Slama, Supervisor and others
Smith v. City of St. Louis et al
as 4:2015cv01765
Plaintiff:
Michael Smith
Defendant:
City of St. Louis, City of St. Louis Police Department, Stephen Slama and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. St. Louis, City of et al
as 4:2011cv01351
Plaintiff:
Chanel Taylor
Defendant:
St. Louis, City of, St. Louis Metropolitan Police Department , Daniel Isom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
