Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00008
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv01119
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv01072
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
General Components, Inc. v. Micron Technology, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv00152
Plaintiff:
General Components, Inc.
Defendant:
Micron Technology, Inc., United Electric Controls Company, Setra Systems, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Obara v. Micron Technology, Inc.
as 1:2010cv00557
Plaintiff:
Marie Obara
Defendant:
Micron Technology, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00026
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334 Bankruptcy Appeal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00679
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Wu v. Micron Technology, Inc.
as 1:2007cv01264
Plaintiff:
Xiaoying Wu
Defendant:
Micron Technology, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0206 Equal Pay Act
Tafas v. Dudas et al
as 1:2007cv00846
Plaintiff:
Triantafyllos Tafas and Triantafyllos Tafas
Defendant:
Jon Dudas and The United States Patent and Trademark Office
Amicu:
Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, Biotechnology Industry Organization, Elan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
SmithKline Beecham Corporation, SmithKline Beecham Corporation, SmithKline Beecham Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Rambus, Inc., et al v. Infineon, et al
as 3:2000cv00524
Plaintiff:
Rambus, Inc.
Defendant:
Infineon Technologies AG, Infineon Technologies North America Corp., Infineon Technologies, Inc. and others
Petitioner:
Micron Technology, Inc., Hynix Semiconductor, Inc., Gray Cary Ware & Freidenrich LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
