Cases 1 - 9 of 9
POPA v. PSP GROUP, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv01357
Plaintiff:
ASHLEY POPA
Defendant:
PSP GROUP, LLC doing business as PET SUPPLIES PLUS and MICROSOFT CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
PPG INDUSTRIES INC v. JIANGSU TIE MAO GLASS CO LTD et al
as 2:2016mc00817
Plaintiff:
PPG INDUSTRIES INC.
Defendant:
JIANGSU TIE MAO GLASS CO., LTD., BENHUA WU and MEI ZHANG
Objector:
MICROSOFT CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: no cause specified
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv01672
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
MICROSOFT CORPORATION v. SMART RESALE, LLC et al
as 2:2013cv01593
Plaintiff:
MICROSOFT CORPORATION
Defendant:
SMART RESALE, LLC and MARY SCHMIDT
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
MICROSOFT CORPORATION v. A1-PC COMPUTER SHOP et al
as 2:2013cv01125
Plaintiff:
MICROSOFT CORPORATION
Defendant:
A1-PC COMPUTER SHOP and DOES 1 THROUGH 3
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00379
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
MICROSOFT CORPORATION v. #1 CYBER DEPOT, LLC et al
as 2:2010cv00597
Plaintiff:
MICROSOFT CORPORATION
Defendant:
#1 CYBER DEPOT, LLC, THOMAS BURICK and EDWARD MAHOLIC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
ADOBE SYSTEMS INCORPORATED et al v. MD OF PC CUSTOM COMPUTERS, LLC et al
as 1:2007cv00007
Plaintiff:
ADOBE SYSTEMS INCORPORATED, ADOBE SYSTEMS INCORPORATED, ADOBE SYSTEMS INCORPORATED and others
Defendant:
MD OF PC CUSTOM COMPUTERS, LLC, JOHN D. CRAIN and GEORGE CRAIN
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
MICROSOFT CORPORATIO v. LAUREL COMPUTER SYST, et al
as 2:2004cv01188
Plaintiff:
MICROSOFT CORPORATION
Defendant:
LAUREL COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC, RAY THOMAS and KEBIN HOLBERT
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
